I once taught a workshop at a national research
institute for fuel cell innovation. The health and safety inspectors had put
the institute on notice for bad and
dangerous communication. They had to work towards correcting the problem. The
institute employed scientists from around the world. I taught workshops
on listening. They explained the problem and invited me to the site.
It appeared
that due to language and cultural differences, safety rules were not being
heard and understood. While everyone spoke English, there was a good chance
that they were also translating in their heads and something might be lost in
the translation. There were also cultural differences.
"Imagine
an expert is explaining a safety procedure," I said, "and you are not
100% sure that you understand. It would be a good idea to say,
- Please explain that again or
- What do you mean by . . .? or
- Can I repeat back my understanding of
this?"
One person
said, "I could not do that. It is considered rude in my culture."
We did some roleplaying and discovered a workaround, so that politeness would not lead to them being BLOWN UP by volatile chemicals.
There were
about 25 scientists and engineers in the workshop. I was wondering how well they listened to one another, so we did this exercise:
I
asked them to explain their job to the person next to them. The next person
would have to repeat back in their own words what the first person's job was.
As we began
this exercise, it quickly became obvious that rather than hearing what the
person was saying, the listener interpreted it or translated it and said it
back inaccurately. As we did this, the class became more engaged and invested. They gradually realized that if there were so many misunderstandings and misinterpretations in this simple exercise, things might be going very badly in more complicated, technical conversations.
The company is still standing. The only thing that has exploded so far is the myths they carried of being good communicators.
No comments:
Post a Comment