In Shakespeare, when parents choose their child’s marital partner, the child rebels – sometimes successfully, sometimes tragically.
In A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Hermia is commanded by her father and by Theseus, the Duke of Athens, to marry Demetrius.  She loves Lysander.  Hermia and Lysander flee to the forest.
In The Merry Wives of Windsor, Ann Page’s mother and father have each picked an inappropropriate husband for Ann.  Ann prefers her own choice, Fenton.  While everyone is gathered in forested Windsor  Park 
In The Merchant of Venice, Shylock’s daughter, Jessica, steals his money and runs away with the lover of her choice, leading Shylock to cry, "My daughter, my ducats."
In Cymbeline, Imogen, the daughter of the king, secretly marries
her beloved, the unfortunately named, Posthumus.  The king wanted her to
marry his stepson, Cloten.
In The Taming of the Shrew, Bianca and Lucentio marry secretly while her father arranges a marriage to another suitor. 
In All’s Well that Ends Well, the King of France commands his son Bertram to marry Helena 
Is the rebellious
child only a device for creating dramatic conflict or was Shakespeare
reflecting a trend of his time?
Lawrence Stone
in his book, The Family, Sex and Marriage In England 1500-1800 (1977) argues
that, in Shakespeare’s day, when parents chose an unacceptable spouse, children would rebel.
Traditionally marriages were made by parents wanting to secure or expand their
property and position in society.  Since these were not love matches,
mistresses were common, mistresses were frequently included in wills, and the
kings of England England 
Increasingly
those of marriageable age thought, if I cannot have an extramarital lover, then I had
better marry someone I love.  This challenge to parental authority was an unintended consequence of Puritanism -- and also a wonderful source of plot material for Shakespeare.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment